“I’m offended by this poster.”

We are too:

• We’re offended that all the terrorist attacks in this poster that killed innocent people were done in the name of Islam

• We’re offended that Islamic demonstrations are holding signs saying, “God Bless Hitler,” “Behead those who insult Islam,” “Islam will dominate the world,” “To Hell with Freedom,” etc

• We’re offended that Islamic fundamentalists hate freedom, liberty and democracy

• We’re offended that Islamists do not believe in the separation of church and state—to them Islam is both religion and state

• We’re offended that Islamists are actively working to replace the US Constitution with the Islamic Sharia Law

• We’re offended that Islamists treat Muslim women as second class property who have no rights

• We’re offended that their Islamic laws would allow them to stone women and gays

• We’re offended that Islamists have massacred moderate Muslims, calling them apostates who deserved to be killed

• We’re offended that Islamists live in the West, taking advantages of all its freedoms, including freedom of speech, but hating the West and wanting to destroy it

• We’re offended that Islamists think that world peace will only happen when the entire world lives under Islam

• We’re offended that Islamists teach their children to hate non-Muslims and encourage their own children to become suicide bombers when they grow up

• We’re offended that Islamic oil money has been funding the Islamic Studies programs in our colleges and universities for nearly 30 years and whose scholars they fund have covered up and denied the growing Islamic Jihad threat, causing the US to be blindsided on 9/11

• We’re offended that Islamists have hateful anti-American literature in US mosques, inciting young men to become jihadists threatening our national security

• We’re offended that Islamists sided with the Nazis during World War II

• We’re offended that Islamists reject the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights

• We’re offended that Islamists have brutally and barbarically beheaded American citizens

• We’re offended that Islamists have gone into Iraq to cause instability to that new democracy and are killing US soldiers

• We’re offended that Islamists thought 9/11 was a great, happy event and danced in the streets in the Middle East

• We’re offended that Islamists make videos on the internet showing how they killed Americans and saying how much they hate us

• We’re offended that that 13% of American Muslims in a poll said they think suicide bombing is justifiable

• We’re offended that Islamists make Islamic women completely cover themselves in hot, suffocating robes (holdover from the 7^th century) that deny the woman’s individuality and humanity and that American feminists say nothing about the horrible treatment of their sisters in the Middle East

• We’re offended that Islamists sued American citizens who were brave enough to speak up when they saw something wrong on an airline flight

• We’re offended that Mohammed Atta and his suicide hijackers shouted the Islamic “God is Great” when they crashed into the Twin Towers, killed thousands of innocent people

• We’re offended that before Islamists go on their terrorist attacks to kill people, they create videos saying they are doing it for Islam and hope their act is pleasing to Allah

• We’re offended that Islamists have cowered moderate Muslims into being too fearful for the lives to speak out against Islamic fundamentalism

• We’re offended that the Islamists have engaged in a long-term, sophisticated denial and deception program against the West and is winning the “War of Ideas” because of the manipulation of the West’s tolerance, justice system, political system, education system and political correctness sensitivities.

• We’re offended that Islamists declared war with us a long time ago and Americans still don’t realize this

• We’re offended that Islamists have stated they would not hesitate to used nuclear or biological weapons against the West

• We’re offended that Americans haven’t learned, haven’t read, and don’t know how great a threat Islamism is to the liberty and security of our country

• We’re offended that there are too many Islamists who desire, plan and act to kill you and that too many people support them. One person who wants to kill you is too many. And remember what a Holocaust survivor said he learned—when someone says they want to kill you, believe them!

If you are not aware that Islam is also political system that hides under a cover of a religion system and does not believe in the separation of church and state at all, you need to read more (Required Reading List). This political system wants to replace the US Constitution with Islamic Sharia Law, which is treason in the United States. Remember the Oath of Office:

I, [name], do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

http://www.opm.gov/constitution_initiative/oath.asp

"As Federal civil servants, we take an oath of office by which we swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. The Constitution not only establishes our system of government, it actually defines the work role for Federal employees - "to establish Justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty."

"The history of the Oath for Federal employees can be traced to the Constitution, where Article II includes the specific oath the President takes - to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States." Article VI requires an oath by all other government officials from all three branches, the military, and the States. It simply states that they "shall be bound by oath of affirmation to support the Constitution." The very first law passed by the very first Congress implemented Article VI by setting out this simple oath in law: "I do solemnly swear or affirm (as the case may be) that I will support the Constitution of the United States."

Islamic Terrorism Timeline

Muhammad's Own Words on Fighting, Jihad, etc

The Islamic Republic by Ayatollah Khomeini

NO to Political Islam

  >>Why Sharia Law must be Opposed

  >>Islam and Human Rights

Top ten reasons why sharia is bad for all societies

Quotes:

“Democracy is the antithesis of sharia.”—Turkish Constitutional Court in 1998

“Sharia is incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy.”—European Court of Human Rights, 1998 

“The purest joy in Islam is to kill and to be killed for Allah.”--Ayatollah Khomeini

To the Ayatollah Khomeini, one of the shah’s ‘most despicable sins’ was the fact that Iran was one of the original group of nations that drafted and approved the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Organization of the Islamic Conference adopted the 1990 “Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam,” which diverges from the UDHR substantially, affirming Sharia as the sole source of human rights.

"According to Muslim teaching, jihad is one of the basic commandments of the faith, an obligation imposed upon all Muslims by God through revelation. It must continue until the whole world has either accepted the Islamic faith or submitted to the power of the Islamic state."--Middle East scholar Bernard Lewis

"Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled or incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. Those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world."--Ayatollah Khomeini

“Islam was destined to become a world religion and to create a civilization which stretched from one end of the globe to the other.”--Official Saudi Arabia website

Islamist War Against America:

Siraj Wahaj, the first imam to deliver a Muslim prayer for the U.S. House of Representatives: “If only Muslims were clever politically, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate. If we were united and strong, we'd elect our own emir [leader] and give allegiance to him. . . . Take my word, if 6-8 million Muslims unite in America, the country will come to us.” He also said, "I see the demise of the Soviet Union as a sign for the American people that what happened in the Soviet Union will definitely happen in America unless America changes its course from the new world order and accepts the Islamic agenda."

He also said, "Wherever you came from, you came to America. And you came for one reason -- for one reason only -- to establish Allah's din [faith], as a servant of Allah."---Speech in Dallas to the Islamic Association of Northern Texas, 15 November 1991

Zaid Shakir, formerly the Muslim chaplain at Yale University, in a speech to the Islamic Society of North America: "Muslims cannot accept the legitimacy of the existing American order, since it is against the orders and ordainments of Allah........And we can make this Islam manifest itself right here in the United States of America so that when people look back in history, they can talk about the Islamic civilization of America."

Ibrahim Cooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), said: "I wouldn't want to create the impression that I wouldn't like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future. But I'm not going to do anything violent to promote that. I'm going to do it through education."

Isma'il Al-Faruqi, a Palestinian immigrant who taught for many years at Temple University wrote: "Nothing could be greater than this youthful, vigorous, and rich continent [of North America] turning away from its past evil and marching forward under the banner of Allahu Akbar [God is great]."

Omar Abdel Rahman - the blind sheikh later convicted of planning a "day of rage" by blowing up New York buildings and architecture - in 1991 called on Muslims to "conquer the land of the infidels."

A native-born American who converted to Islam and helped fight the Soviets in Afghanistan, then proclaimed that "it is the duty of all Muslims to complete the march of jihad [holy war] until we reach America and liberate her."

Masudul Alam Choudhury, a Canadian professor of business, matter-of-factly advocates the "Islamization agenda in North America." Ahmad Nawfal, a Jordanian who spoke often at American rallies a few years ago, says that if fundamentalist Muslims stand up, "it will be very easy for us to preside over this world once again."

Shamim A. Siddiqi wrote a book on establishing "Islamic rule" in the United States, with the goal of Muslims creating "a strong lobby in Washington for the promotion of Islam in this country as well as elsewhere in the world."

Excerpt from Daniel Pipe's book "Militant Islam Reaches America":

For a full exposition of this outlook, one can do no better than to turn to a 1989 book written by Shamim Siddiqi, an influential commentator on American Muslim issues, and published in Brooklyn. Cryptically entitled Methodology of Dawah Ilallah in American Perspective (which can be more idiomatically rendered as The Need to Convert Americans to Islam), this 168-page study is nearly unavailable to a general audience (neither amazon.com nor bookfinder.com listed it over a period of months), but is widely found on militant Islamic Web sites and has a faithful readership among their visitors. Siddiqi lays out a detailed justification and plan for Islamists to take over the United States that bears close attention.

Siddiqi argues that Muslims taking control of the United States has more importance than such goals as sustaining the Iranian revolution or destroying Israel, for it has greater impact on the future of Islam. The centrality of America hinges not on the reasons one might expect - its large population, wealth, or cultural influence - but on three other arguments:

• The perception of Washington as the premier enemy of militant Islam (or, possibly, Islam itself). In Siddiqi's colorful language, whenever Muslims move toward the emergence of an Islamic state, the "treacherous hands of the secular West are always there in the Muslim world to bring about the defeat of the Islamic forces." Muslim rulers are no help, for they are "all in the pockets of the Western powers." To permit Islam to attain its rightful place requires that the "ideology of Islam prevail over the mental horizon of the American people." The future of the Muslim world, Siddiqi concludes, "now depends on how soon the Muslims of America are able to build up their own indigenous movement."

• Establishing militant Islam in America would signal the triumph of this ideology over its only rival, the bundle of Christianity and liberalism that constitutes Western civilization. (So much for Fukuyama's "end of history" thesis, which also appeared in 1989.)

• Joining Islam and the United States makes for an ideal team, Siddiqi wrote in a subsequent article. The United States is more successful than any country with a Muslim majority, but it lacks a guiding ideology and is decaying morally. Bringing together this successful country with that "superb ideology" makes for an extraordinary combination.

Contemplating the implications of a militant Islamic victory in the United States, Siddiqi can hardly contain his enthusiasm, finding that this could mean that the establishment of "God's Kingdom" on earth no longer is "a distant dream."

Another excerpt from the book:

"One of them [American converts to Islam], Jeffrey Lang, writes of his dismay attending a lecture in a San Francisco mosque not long after his conversion and hearing an immigrant medical student issue a seditious call to arms:

"We must never forget - and this is extremely important - that as Muslims, we are obligated to desire, and when possible to participate in, the overthrow of any non-Islamic government - anywhere in the world - in order to replace it by an Islamic one."

But calling on Muslims to overthrow the U.S. government, Lang protested to the lecturer, means that accepting Islam was tantamount to an act of political treason. "Yes, that's true," the lecturer blithely replied.

U.S. GOVERNMENT ADJUDICATIVE GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY FOR ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION

GUIDELINE A: ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES

3. The Concern. An individual must be of unquestioned allegiance to the United States. The willingness to safeguard classified information is in doubt if there is any reason to suspect an individual's allegiance to the United States.

4. Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:

(a) involvement in, support of, training to commit, or advocacy of any act of sabotage, espionage, treason, terrorism, or sedition against the United States of America;

(b) association or sympathy with persons who are attempting to commit, or who are committing, any of the above acts;

(c) association or sympathy with persons or organizations that advocate, threaten, or use force or violence, or use any other illegal or unconstitutional means, in an effort to:

(1) overthrow or influence the government of the United States or any state or local government;

(2) prevent Federal, state, or local government personnel from performing their official duties;

(3) gain retribution for perceived wrongs caused by the Federal, state, or local government;

(4) prevent others from exercising their rights under the Constitution or laws of the United States or of any state.

5. Conditions that could mitigate security concerns include:

(a) the individual was unaware of the unlawful aims of the individual or organization and severed ties upon learning of these;

(b) the individual's involvement was only with the lawful or humanitarian aspects of such an organization;

(c) involvement in the above activities occurred for only a short period of time and was attributable to curiosity or academic interest;

(d) the involvement or association with such activities occurred under such unusual circumstances, or so much times has elapsed, that it is unlikely to recur and does not cast doubt on the individual's current reliability, trustworthiness, or loyalty.